Nicoll v. Nicoll
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 37
This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 37 (Nicoll v. Nicoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nicoll v. Nicoll, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 37 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
The Court of Errors, in this case held, that an attorney’s lien for his costs is no bar to a bill in chancery, filed to obtain a set off against the client; nor is it a bar when the question arises on a trial at law. The decree of the Chancellor sustaining the lien was therefore reversed. 13 for reversal, 8 for affirmation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicoll-v-nicoll-nycterr-1799.