Nicoll v. Nicoll
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 37
Opinion
The Court of Errors, in this case held, that an attorney’s lien for his costs is no bar to a bill in chancery, filed to obtain a set off against the client; nor is it a bar when the question arises on a trial at law. The decree of the Chancellor sustaining the lien was therefore reversed. 13 for reversal, 8 for affirmation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nicoll v. Nicoll, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 37 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 37 (Nicoll v. Nicoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.