Nicolino v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.

94 N.Y.S. 1157

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 1157 (Nicolino v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicolino v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co., 94 N.Y.S. 1157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was evidence, which the jury had a right to credit, that the plaintiff had been discharged cured from the hospital in nine days. There was also evidence that on December 29th there was no synovitis, as all evidence of a fractured rib had been struck out. We believe that the verdict should not have been considered inadequate. The order will therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, the verdict restored, and judgment entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 N.Y.S. 1157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicolino-v-forty-second-street-manhattanville-st-nicholas-avenue-nyappterm-1905.