Nicolino v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Nicolino v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.

94 N.Y.S. 1157

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 22, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was evidence, which the jury had a right to credit, that the plaintiff had been discharged cured from the hospital in nine days. There was also evidence that on December 29th there was no synovitis, as all evidence of a fractured rib had been struck out. We believe that the verdict should not have been considered inadequate. The order will therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, the verdict restored, and judgment entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There was evidence, which the jury had a right to credit, that the plaintiff had been discharged cured from the hospital in nine days. There was also evidence that on December 29th there was no synovitis, as all evidence of a fractured rib had been struck out. We believe that the verdict should not have been considered inadequate. The order will therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, the verdict restored, and judgment entered accordingly.

Nicolino v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co., 94 N.Y.S. 1157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

94 N.Y.S. 1157 (Nicolino v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.