Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.

247 A.D. 786

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Defendant moved at Special Term for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs [787]*787had not complied with an ex parte order requiring them to furnish security for costs. Said motion was granted, and judgment entered. Judgment and order granting motion to dismiss complaint reversed, without costs, and motion denied. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant moved at Special Term for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs [787]*787had not complied with an ex parte order requiring them to furnish security for costs. Said motion was granted, and judgment entered. Judgment and order granting motion to dismiss complaint reversed, without costs, and motion denied. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co., 247 A.D. 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 786 (Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.