Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.

247 A.D. 786
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1936
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 786 (Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co., 247 A.D. 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Defendant moved at Special Term for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs [787]*787had not complied with an ex parte order requiring them to furnish security for costs. Said motion was granted, and judgment entered. Judgment and order granting motion to dismiss complaint reversed, without costs, and motion denied. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicoletti-v-union-railway-co-nyappdiv-1936.