Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.
This text of 247 A.D. 786 (Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant moved at Special Term for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs [787]*787had not complied with an ex parte order requiring them to furnish security for costs. Said motion was granted, and judgment entered. Judgment and order granting motion to dismiss complaint reversed, without costs, and motion denied. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicoletti-v-union-railway-co-nyappdiv-1936.