Nicole Alexandra Intriago-Sedgwick v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; Warden Dora Castro, in her official capacity as Warden of the Otero County Processing Center; Mary De Anda-Ybarra, in her official capacity as Field Office Director of the El Paso Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations; and Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as Acting Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Mexico
DecidedOctober 28, 2025
Docket1:25-cv-01065
StatusUnknown

This text of Nicole Alexandra Intriago-Sedgwick v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; Warden Dora Castro, in her official capacity as Warden of the Otero County Processing Center; Mary De Anda-Ybarra, in her official capacity as Field Office Director of the El Paso Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations; and Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as Acting Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Nicole Alexandra Intriago-Sedgwick v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; Warden Dora Castro, in her official capacity as Warden of the Otero County Processing Center; Mary De Anda-Ybarra, in her official capacity as Field Office Director of the El Paso Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations; and Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as Acting Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicole Alexandra Intriago-Sedgwick v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; Warden Dora Castro, in her official capacity as Warden of the Otero County Processing Center; Mary De Anda-Ybarra, in her official capacity as Field Office Director of the El Paso Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations; and Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as Acting Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (D.N.M. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

NICOLE ALEXANDRA INTRIAGO- SEDGWICK,

Petitioner,

v. Civil No. 1:25-cv-01065-MIS-LF KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; PAMELA BONDI, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; WARDEN DORA CASTRO, in her official capacity as Warden of the Otero County Processing Center; MARY DE ANDA-YBARRA, in her official capacity as Field Office Director of the El Paso Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations; and TODD LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,

Respondents.

ORDER OF REFERENCE In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case.1 The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The

1 The Parties are reminded that they may consent to the Magistrate Judge at any time by submitting Form AO 85. parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition.

MARGARET STRICKLAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virginia Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wood
901 F.2d 849 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nicole Alexandra Intriago-Sedgwick v. Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; Warden Dora Castro, in her official capacity as Warden of the Otero County Processing Center; Mary De Anda-Ybarra, in her official capacity as Field Office Director of the El Paso Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations; and Todd Lyons, in his official capacity as Acting Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicole-alexandra-intriago-sedgwick-v-kristi-noem-in-her-official-capacity-nmd-2025.