Nicolau v. Muresanu-Rios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nicolau v. Muresanu-Rios

207 A.D.2d 492, 616 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 22, 1994·Published

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 to change custody of the parties’ infant child, the petitioner father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), dated March 10, 1992, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the petitioner’s contention that the court erred in dismissing the petition after the petitioner presented his case (cf., Matter of Gant v Higgins, 203 AD2d 23). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 to change custody of the parties’ infant child, the petitioner father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), dated March 10, 1992, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the petitioner’s contention that the court erred in dismissing the petition after the petitioner presented his case (cf., Matter of Gant v Higgins, 203 AD2d 23). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.

Nicolau v. Muresanu-Rios, 207 A.D.2d 492, 616 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

207 A.D.2d 492 (Nicolau v. Muresanu-Rios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related