Nicolas Contreras v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2007
Docket07-07-00338-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Nicolas Contreras v. State (Nicolas Contreras v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicolas Contreras v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO. 07-07-0338-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


SEPTEMBER 28, 2007

______________________________


NICOLAS CONTRERAS, APPELLANT


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________


FROM THE 121ST DISTRICT COURT OF TERRY COUNTY;


NO. 5580; HONORABLE KELLY G. MOORE, JUDGE
_______________________________


Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Pending before this Court is appellant's motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Mackey K. Hancock

Justice



Do not publish.

on of record has been received and no arrangement to pay for the records has been made. No appearance has been made by any counsel for appellant on appeal.

In Texas, every person convicted of a crime has a statutory right to appeal. See Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. § 44.02 (Vernon 1979); Nguyen v. State, 11 S.W.3d 376, 378-79 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.); Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 644 (Tex.App.--Waco 1994, pet. ref'd). The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution guarantee to a criminal defendant the right to counsel on a first appeal. See Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963). An attorney must be appointed by the state to represent an indigent defendant on the first appeal. See McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, Dist. 1, 486 U.S. 429, 435, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1900, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). In Texas, the trial court has been designated to appoint the appellate attorney for an eligible indigent defendant. See Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. §§ 1.051(d)(1), 26.04(a).

These appeals are abated and the causes are remanded to the trial court. Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute any or all of the appeals; (2) if appellant desires to prosecute any or all of the appeals, then whether appellant is indigent; (3) if appellant is indigent and desires to prosecute any or all of the appeals, whether counsel should be appointed for appeal; and (4) what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant's appeals if appellant does not desire to prosecute any of the appeals, or, if appellant desires to prosecute any of the appeals, to assure that the appeals will be diligently pursued. If the trial court determines that counsel should be appointed for any or all of the appeals, the trial court should cause the clerk of this court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the appointed attorney.

The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and file appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations, and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk's record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings to be transcribed and included in a reporter's record of the hearing; and (4) have a record of the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the supplemental clerk's record or the reporter's record of the hearing. In the absence of a request for extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk's record, reporter's record of the hearing, and any additional proceeding records, including any orders, findings conclusions and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be received by the clerk of this court not later than August 29, 2003.

Per Curiam





Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas v. California
372 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 1963)
McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1
486 U.S. 429 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Nguyen v. State
11 S.W.3d 376 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Johnson v. State
885 S.W.2d 641 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nicolas Contreras v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicolas-contreras-v-state-texapp-2007.