Nicolai v. Hayduk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nicolai v. Hayduk

54 A.D.2d 704, 387 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14280

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 704 (Nicolai v. Hayduk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicolai v. Hayduk, 54 A.D.2d 704, 387 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Richard O. Reyes, William H. Schwarz and Oscar Radin as candidates of the Liberal Party in the general election to be held on November 2, 1976 for the public offices of Sheriff of Westchester County, County Clerk of Westchester County and State Assemblyman from the 91st Assembly District, respectively, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 13, 1976, which dismissed the petition as against each of the above-mentioned respondents and directed the Board of Elections to place their names on the ballot. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Burchell. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Richard O. Reyes, William H. Schwarz and Oscar Radin as candidates of the Liberal Party in the general election to be held on November 2, 1976 for the public offices of Sheriff of Westchester County, County Clerk of Westchester County and State Assemblyman from the 91st Assembly District, respectively, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 13, 1976, which dismissed the petition as against each of the above-mentioned respondents and directed the Board of Elections to place their names on the ballot. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Burchell. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 704, 387 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicolai-v-hayduk-nyappdiv-1976.