Nicol v. State Bd. of Land Commr. of State of Montana

Montana Supreme Court

Nicol v. State Bd. of Land Commr. of State of Montana

209 P.2d 1019, 121 Mont. 617, 1948 Mont. LEXIS 56

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 6, 1948

DocketNo. 8827.

StatusPublished

This text of 209 P.2d 1019 (Nicol v. State Bd. of Land Commr. of State of Montana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicol v. State Bd. of Land Commr. of State of Montana, 209 P.2d 1019, 121 Mont. 617, 1948 Mont. LEXIS 56 (Mo. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that there is no immediate emergency or neces *618 sity for this Court assuming original jurisdiction herein for the reason that it affirmatively appears from the record and argument of counsel that the lands involved are being cultivated and farmed by John Stoos and sons-either under agreement with the petitioner H. J. Nicol or under agreement with the State of Montana made by and through the State Board of Land Commissioners of the State of Montana, and that the rights of the respective parties may be speedily determined without loss to any of the parties by proper proceedings instituted in the District Court,

Messrs. Gtraybill & Bradford and Mr. S. Norshog, all of Great Falls, for Petitioner.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the writ of certiorari be denied.

Hugh Adair, Chief Justice, Albert H. Angstman, I. W. Choate, Associate Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that there is no immediate emergency or neces *618 sity for this Court assuming original jurisdiction herein for the reason that it affirmatively appears from the record and argument of counsel that the lands involved are being cultivated and farmed by John Stoos and sons-either under agreement with the petitioner H. J. Nicol or under agreement with the State of Montana made by and through the State Board of Land Commissioners of the State of Montana, and that the rights of the respective parties may be speedily determined without loss to any of the parties by proper proceedings instituted in the District Court,

Messrs. Gtraybill & Bradford and Mr. S. Norshog, all of Great Falls, for Petitioner.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the writ of certiorari be denied.

Hugh Adair, Chief Justice, Albert H. Angstman, I. W. Choate, Associate Justices.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 P.2d 1019, 121 Mont. 617, 1948 Mont. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicol-v-state-bd-of-land-commr-of-state-of-montana-mont-1948.