Nico Leasing, Inc. v. Viacao Barao De Maua Ltda.
This text of 668 So. 2d 335 (Nico Leasing, Inc. v. Viacao Barao De Maua Ltda.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order under review, which denied a motion to set aside a clerk’s default, is reversed because the default was improperly secured without notice after the plaintiff became aware that the defendant was or would be represented by counsel and desired actively to defend the case. Sklar v. Brawley, 651 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Ole, Inc. v. Yariv, 566 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 462 So.2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 So. 2d 335, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1565, 1996 WL 72324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nico-leasing-inc-v-viacao-barao-de-maua-ltda-fladistctapp-1996.