Nico Leasing, Inc. v. Viacao Barao De Maua Ltda.

668 So. 2d 335, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1565, 1996 WL 72324
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2482
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 668 So. 2d 335 (Nico Leasing, Inc. v. Viacao Barao De Maua Ltda.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nico Leasing, Inc. v. Viacao Barao De Maua Ltda., 668 So. 2d 335, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1565, 1996 WL 72324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review, which denied a motion to set aside a clerk’s default, is reversed because the default was improperly secured without notice after the plaintiff became aware that the defendant was or would be represented by counsel and desired actively to defend the case. Sklar v. Brawley, 651 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Ole, Inc. v. Yariv, 566 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 462 So.2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hornblower v. Cobb
932 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Suncore Engineering, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.
723 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 So. 2d 335, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1565, 1996 WL 72324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nico-leasing-inc-v-viacao-barao-de-maua-ltda-fladistctapp-1996.