Nicks v. State
783 So. 2d 926, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 498, 2000 WL 1716956
Opinions
The writ of certiorari is quashed. In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving the discussion, or the analysis, of the substantive-competency issue in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. See Card v. Dugger, 911 F.2d 1494, 1519-20 (11th Cir.1990)(noting that, in addressing a substantive-competency issue, a reviewing court should not limit its review to the evidence of competency that was before the trial court).
WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nicks v. State, 783 So. 2d 926, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 498, 2000 WL 1716956 (Ala. 2000).
783 So. 2d 926 (Nicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bush v. State
92 So. 3d 121 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2009)
Hooks v. State
21 So. 3d 772 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
Brown v. State
982 So. 2d 565 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2006)
Elmore v. State
912 So. 2d 1160 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
Jenkins v. State
972 So. 2d 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
DeBruce v. State
890 So. 2d 1068 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Dowdell v. State
854 So. 2d 1195 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)