Nicks v. State
This text of 783 So. 2d 926 (Nicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The writ of certiorari is quashed. In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving the discussion, or the analysis, of the substantive-competency issue in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. See Card v. Dugger, 911 F.2d 1494, 1519-20 (11th Cir.1990)(noting that, in addressing a substantive-competency issue, a reviewing court should not limit its review to the evidence of competency that was before the trial court).
WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
783 So. 2d 926, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 498, 2000 WL 1716956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicks-v-state-ala-2000.