Nicks v. State

783 So. 2d 926, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 498, 2000 WL 1716956
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 17, 2000
Docket1990363
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 783 So. 2d 926 (Nicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicks v. State, 783 So. 2d 926, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 498, 2000 WL 1716956 (Ala. 2000).

Opinions

SEE, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed. In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving the discussion, or the analysis, of the substantive-competency issue in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. See Card v. Dugger, 911 F.2d 1494, 1519-20 (11th Cir.1990)(noting that, in addressing a substantive-competency issue, a reviewing court should not limit its review to the evidence of competency that was before the trial court).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, LYONS, BROWN, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bush v. State
92 So. 3d 121 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2009)
Hooks v. State
21 So. 3d 772 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
Brown v. State
982 So. 2d 565 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2006)
Elmore v. State
912 So. 2d 1160 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
Jenkins v. State
972 So. 2d 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
DeBruce v. State
890 So. 2d 1068 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Dowdell v. State
854 So. 2d 1195 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
783 So. 2d 926, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 498, 2000 WL 1716956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicks-v-state-ala-2000.