Nickols v. Jones
This text of 31 A. 329 (Nickols v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case depended mainly on questions of fact as to which the testimony was more or less conflicting. It was therefore submitted to the jury, who, by their verdict for defendant, impliedly found all the material issues of fact in his favor. One of them was as to the credit of fll.60 claimed by defendant; another was his alleged tender of the entire balance of rent due plaintiff, etc. An examination of the record with reference to each of the six specifications has failed to convince us that there is any substantial error in either of the rulings recited therein.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A. 329, 166 Pa. 599, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickols-v-jones-pa-1895.