Nicklos Drilling Company and Compass Insurance Company v. Floyd Cowart and Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

Fifth Circuit

Nicklos Drilling Company and Compass Insurance Company v. Floyd Cowart and Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

917 F.2d 878, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19636, 1990 WL 170399

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 6, 1990

Docket89-4944

StatusPublished

This text of 917 F.2d 878 (Nicklos Drilling Company and Compass Insurance Company v. Floyd Cowart and Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicklos Drilling Company and Compass Insurance Company v. Floyd Cowart and Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, 917 F.2d 878, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19636, 1990 WL 170399 (5th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 9, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 907 F.2d 1552)

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 9, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 907 F.2d 1552)

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

917 F.2d 878, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19636, 1990 WL 170399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicklos-drilling-company-and-compass-insurance-company-v-floyd-cowart-and-ca5-1990.