Nickleski v. Aeronaves de Mexico, S. A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nickleski v. Aeronaves de Mexico, S. A.

18 A.D.2d 709, 236 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6275

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 709 (Nickleski v. Aeronaves de Mexico, S. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nickleski v. Aeronaves de Mexico, S. A., 18 A.D.2d 709, 236 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property sustained by plaintiff when the jet aircraft of the defendant corporation Aeronaves de Mexico, S. A., went out of control on take-off from New York International Airport and crashed into plaintiff’s automobile which she was then operating on a public highway adjacent to said airport, the said defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 4, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against it, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice (see 34 Mise 2d 834). Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which should be resolved upon a trial. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property sustained by plaintiff when the jet aircraft of the defendant corporation Aeronaves de Mexico, S. A., went out of control on take-off from New York International Airport and crashed into plaintiff’s automobile which she was then operating on a public highway adjacent to said airport, the said defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 4, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against it, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice (see 34 Mise 2d 834). Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which should be resolved upon a trial. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 709, 236 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickleski-v-aeronaves-de-mexico-s-a-nyappdiv-1962.