Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank

1969 OK 156, 459 P.2d 853, 1969 Okla. LEXIS 475
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 14, 1969·No. 43399·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Motion to dismiss supported by affidavit, alleging the appeal in effect has been abandoned by plaintiff in error because of unexcused failure to designate the record pursuant to Rule 10 has been filed.

Response to motion to dismiss required under General Rule 9 (12 O.S.1961 following § 986 p. 868, 869) was not made. Plaintiff in error was directed to show cause by a time certain why this appeal should not be dismissed as abandoned. No response has been filed.

Unexcused failure by plaintiff in error to timely designate the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Rule 10, Rules for Civil Appeals, 40 OBJ 1, p. 17, January 11, 1969, constitutes an abandonment of the appeal and appeal is subject to dismissal under such circumstances.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

AH the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank, 1969 OK 156, 459 P.2d 853, 1969 Okla. LEXIS 475 (Okla. 1969).

1969 OK 156 (Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Robert's Hawaii Tour, Inc.
664 P.2d 262 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1983)
Haynes v. Barnett
1971 OK 43 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1971)
Harmony Dependent School District 106 of Payne County v. Carrier
1970 OK 10 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1970)