Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank
This text of 1969 OK 156 (Nicklau v. Peoples State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss supported by affidavit, alleging the appeal in effect has been abandoned by plaintiff in error because of unexcused failure to designate the record pursuant to Rule 10 has been filed.
Response to motion to dismiss required under General Rule 9 (12 O.S.1961 following § 986 p. 868, 869) was not made. Plaintiff in error was directed to show cause by a time certain why this appeal should not be dismissed as abandoned. No response has been filed.
Unexcused failure by plaintiff in error to timely designate the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Rule 10, Rules for Civil Appeals, 40 OBJ 1, p. 17, January 11, 1969, constitutes an abandonment of the appeal and appeal is subject to dismissal under such circumstances.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1969 OK 156, 459 P.2d 853, 1969 Okla. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicklau-v-peoples-state-bank-okla-1969.