Nicking v. Nesmith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Nicking v. Nesmith

15 Iowa 595, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 176

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedJune 5, 1863

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Iowa 595 (Nicking v. Nesmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicking v. Nesmith, 15 Iowa 595, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 176 (iowa 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

The ruling of the court below refusing to retax costs, was affirmed by reasons stated by —

G. R. Strubie for the appellant — J. L. AUen for the appellee.

Wright, J.

Defendants appeal from an order refusing to refax certain costs. Whether the facts were as claimed by them in their motion, we have no means of knowing. It only appears that they ■ moved, for certain causes, to exclude the fees of several witnesses from the taxation of costs. There is no bill of exceptions, or anything else to show that these causes had any foundation in fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The ruling of the court below refusing to retax costs, was affirmed by reasons stated by —

G. R. Strubie for the appellant — J. L. AUen for the appellee.

Wright, J.

Defendants appeal from an order refusing to refax certain costs. Whether the facts were as claimed by them in their motion, we have no means of knowing. It only appears that they ■ moved, for certain causes, to exclude the fees of several witnesses from the taxation of costs. There is no bill of exceptions, or anything else to show that these causes had any foundation in fact.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Iowa 595, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicking-v-nesmith-iowa-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack