Nickerson v. Thacher

16 N.E. 581, 146 Mass. 609, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 305
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 4, 1888·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

One who is in the actual occupation of land may maintain trespass against any person except the real owner, or the person having a right of possession. Barnstable v. Thacher, 3 Met. 239. Sweetland v. Stetson, 115 Mass. 49. There was nothing to show that the defendant had any right whatever to [610]*610go upon the land; but the stress of his argument is, that the plaintiff’s title was not good. We need not enter upon that question; although we may remark that those in whom the title stood, if not in her, not only have never questioned, but expressly affirmed her title. The utmost that we have to decide is, that the proceedings setting off the land to her, whether valid or invalid, never having been doubted, might be put in evidence upon the question of her possession of the land. And of this we have no doubt. Allen v. Taft, 6 Gray, 552, 554. Motte v. Alger, 15 Gray, 322. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nickerson v. Thacher, 16 N.E. 581, 146 Mass. 609, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 305 (Mass. 1888).

16 N.E. 581 (Nickerson v. Thacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Uliasz v. Gillette
256 N.E.2d 290 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)
Munson v. Goodro
204 A.2d 126 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1964)
New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.
49 N.E.2d 121 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Hunt Drug Co. v. Hubert
10 N.E.2d 108 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Fowler v. Owen
39 A. 329 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1895)