Nickerson v. State

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 2022
DocketOP 22-0007
StatusUnpublished

This text of Nickerson v. State (Nickerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nickerson v. State, (Mo. 2022).

Opinion

,„,„,NAL 03/15/2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: OP 22-0007

OP 22-0007 RLED SHANE PHILLIP MCKERSON, mAR 1 5 2022 ofq0IVA/OpCodurt Bowen 0 10 fic of Supreme Montana Petitioner, State of

v. ORDER STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

Shane Phillip Nickerson petitions this Court for rehearing of our January 18, 2022 Order denying and dismissing his petition for writ of mandate, which sought to direct the Department of Corrections (DOC) to place him in Montana instead of South Dakota. Nickerson contends that the DOC placed him in South Dakota in retaliation for his pending civil cases against it. He further contends that he cannot complete the required sex offender program treatment in South Dakota. In accordance with M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a), this Court will consider a petition for rehearing upon very limited grounds. "Absent clearly demonstrated exceptional circumstances, the supreme court will not grant petitions for rehearing of its orders disposing of motions or petitions for extraordinary writs." M. R. App. P. 20(1)(d). It appears from information available on the DOC website that Nickerson was transferred to the Montana State Prison on February 24, 2022, approximately two weeks after he filed his Motion for Rehearing. "A question is rendered moot when, due to some event or happening, the issue ceases to exist and the court caimot grant effective relief." Cape v. Crossroads Corr. Ctr., 2004 MT 265, ¶ 25, 323 Mont. 140, 99 P.3d 171 (quoting Grabow v. Montana High School Ass 'n, 2000 MT 159, ¶ 14, 300 Mont. 227, 3 P.3d 650 (citing Shamrock Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 1999 MT 21, ¶ 19, 293 Mont. 188, 974 P.2d 1150)). As Nickerson's petition for writ of mandate sought relief from his then-current placement, his claims are now moot. Nickerson has not demonstrated exceptional circumstances for rehearing. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Nickerson's Motion for Rehearing is DENIED. The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to Shane Phillip Nickerson personally. DATED this 6 ay of March, 2022.

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shamrock Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
1999 MT 21 (Montana Supreme Court, 1999)
Grabow v. MONTANA HIGH SCHOOL ASS'N.
2000 MT 159 (Montana Supreme Court, 2000)
Cape v. Crossroads Correctional Center
2004 MT 265 (Montana Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nickerson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickerson-v-state-mont-2022.