Nickerson v. State
602 So. 2d 1001, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 1992 WL 201996
Opinion
Appellant raises three points in this appeal, only one of which merits discussion. He contends that his conviction of both attempted burglary and possession of burglary tools violated the protection against double jeopardy. We held to the contrary in Jones v. State, 588 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA1991), but certified conflict with Ghent v. State, 536 So.2d 285 (Fla. 3d DCA1988). As in Jones, we certify conflict with Ghent.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nickerson v. State, 602 So. 2d 1001, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 1992 WL 201996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
602 So. 2d 1001 (Nickerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
588 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Ghent v. State
536 So. 2d 285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)