Nickerson v. State
This text of 602 So. 2d 1001 (Nickerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant raises three points in this appeal, only one of which merits discussion. He contends that his conviction of both attempted burglary and possession of burglary tools violated the protection against double jeopardy. We held to the contrary in Jones v. State, 588 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA1991), but certified conflict with Ghent v. State, 536 So.2d 285 (Fla. 3d DCA1988). As in Jones, we certify conflict with Ghent.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
602 So. 2d 1001, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 1992 WL 201996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickerson-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.