Nickerson v. State

602 So. 2d 1001, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 1992 WL 201996
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 1992
DocketNo. 91-03677
StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 1001 (Nickerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nickerson v. State, 602 So. 2d 1001, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 1992 WL 201996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three points in this appeal, only one of which merits discussion. He contends that his conviction of both attempted burglary and possession of burglary tools violated the protection against double jeopardy. We held to the contrary in Jones v. State, 588 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA1991), but certified conflict with Ghent v. State, 536 So.2d 285 (Fla. 3d DCA1988). As in Jones, we certify conflict with Ghent.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
588 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Ghent v. State
536 So. 2d 285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 So. 2d 1001, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 1992 WL 201996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickerson-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.