Nickerson v. Incorporated Town of Waynoka

1930 OK 594, 298 P. 264, 148 Okla. 198, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 390
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 23, 1930·No. 19613·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HEENER, J.

The facts in this case differ in no material respect from the facts of the case of Wilbur Barnett v. Incorporated Town of Waynoka, No. 19612, 148 Okla. 24, 296 Okla. 972. The same questions are involved and it seems to be the agreement by both parties that the brief and argument in the Barnett Case shall be used in this case. It is therefore ordered that the syllabus in the Barnett Case be adopted in this case and that the jüdgment of the trial court herein be affirmed.

LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, SWIN-DALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., and HUNT, RILEY, and CULLISON, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nickerson v. Incorporated Town of Waynoka, 1930 OK 594, 298 P. 264, 148 Okla. 198, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 390 (Okla. 1930).

1930 OK 594 (Nickerson v. Incorporated Town of Waynoka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standard Accident Insurance v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.
1937 OK 150 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Tway v. Thompson
1932 OK 595 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)