Nickerson v. Crawford
This text of 11 N.Y.S. 503 (Nickerson v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action is brought by plaintiff as owner of a house and lot in the city of New York, to restrain a nuisance maintained by defendants upon adjoining property, and for damages caused by the nuisance. It is the application for equitable relief that gives a court of equity jurisdiction, and the action thereby becomes an equitable action. That cause of ac.tion, however, vested in the plaintiff as the owner of the adjoining premises. As a mere individual, disconnected with his ownership of the property, he would have no right of action to abate the nuisance. It is only because of the special injury sustained by him as owner of the adjacent premises that lie can maintain an action in equity to restrain the continuance of the nuisance. The action is, therefore, not one for personal injury, but-an equitable action for an injunction, and for the damages caused by the wrongful act complained of, and the depreciation of the rental value of the premises owned by plaintiff would be the measure of damages if he succeeded in establishing that the defendants maintained a nuisance. On the transfer by plaintiff of the property to restrain an injury to which the action is brought, the right [504]*504of action passed to the transferee, and I think he should be substituted as the plaintiff in this action. Motion will therefore be granted, with $10 costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.Y.S. 503, 25 Abb. N. Cas. 91, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickerson-v-crawford-nysupct-1890.