Nickerson v. Babcock

29 Ill. 497
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

The note upon which this suit is brought, contains this condition : “And we further agree, if the above note is not paid without suit, to pay ten dollars in addition to the above for attorney fees.” This presents the question, whether this ten dollars can be recovered in the same action, with the principal of the note. It is only payable upon a contingency, and that can never occur until suit is brought to enforce the payment of the note. This sum was not due until suit was instituted, and no rule of practice is more uniformly recognized, than that a suit cannot be maintained before a demand is due. The plaintiff is, therefore, limited in his recovery, to the debt or damages due at the time of suing the writ. The ten dollars in this case was not due when the writ issued, and consequently was improperly included in the assessment of damages.

The judgment of the court below is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nickerson v. Babcock, 29 Ill. 497 (Ill. 1863).

29 Ill. 497 (Nickerson v. Babcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washingtonian Home v. Van Meter
18 N.E.2d 81 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1938)
People's State Bank v. Smith
231 N.W. 141 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1930)
Bacon v. Schepflin
56 N.E. 1123 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1900)
Washburne v. Burke
84 Ill. App. 587 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)
Dearlove v. Edwards
46 N.E. 1081 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1897)
Piasa Bluffs Improvement Co. v. Evers
65 Ill. App. 205 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Condon v. Charles Bruse & Co.
58 Ill. App. 254 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
Dorsey v. Wolff
18 L.R.A. 428 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Otter Creek Lumber Co. v. McElwee
37 Ill. App. 285 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
Barton v. Farmers & Merchants' National Bank
13 N.E. 503 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1887)
Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Barton
21 Ill. App. 403 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Clark v. Morgan
13 Ill. App. 597 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1883)
Collins v. Montemy
3 Ill. App. 182 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1878)
Byers v. First National Bank
85 Ill. 423 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1877)
Easter v. Boyd
79 Ill. 325 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)
Clawson v. Munson
55 Ill. 394 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)