Nickelson v. State
This text of 30 So. 3d 707 (Nickelson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Christopher Nickelson appeals the order imposing restitution following his convictions for scheming to defraud and equity skimming. Nickelson argues that the trial court erred by refusing to hold an eviden-tiary hearing on the amount of restitution and by relying instead on the victim’s trial testimony to set the amount of restitution over Nickelson’s objection. The State properly concedes error. As we did in Nickelson’s codefendant’s case, Nickelson-Ippolito v. State, 17 So.3d 1257 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), we reverse and remand for a new restitution hearing.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 So. 3d 707, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3903, 2010 WL 1135968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickelson-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.