Nicholson v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided January 20, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-04745·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Lloyd Nicholson, Case No. 2:19-cv-4745 Petitioner, Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v.

Warden, Noble Correctional Institution,

Respondent.

ORDER

On September 18, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. ECF No. 19. Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The R&R, ECF No. 19, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Petitioner has waived the right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Michael H. Watson______________ MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nicholson v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution, (S.D. Ohio 2021).

Nicholson v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution (Nicholson v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related