Nicholson v. Thompson

Sixth Circuit

Nicholson v. Thompson

171 F.2d 295

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 16, 1948

DocketNo. 10690

StatusPublished

This text of 171 F.2d 295 (Nicholson v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicholson v. Thompson, 171 F.2d 295 (6th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard upon full oral arguments by attorneys for the respective parties, and having been duly considered thereon and upon the record and briefs; and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury upon which judgment for the defendant was entered, and that no reversible error was committed in the trial of the case; The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard upon full oral arguments by attorneys for the respective parties, and having been duly considered thereon and upon the record and briefs; and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury upon which judgment for the defendant was entered, and that no reversible error was committed in the trial of the case; The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 F.2d 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-v-thompson-ca6-1948.