Nicholson v. State

226 S.W. 405, 88 Tex. Crim. 311, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nicholson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 Tex. Crim. 383
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 16, 1920·No. No. 6009.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Smith County, Texas, of the offense of aggravated assault, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and thirty days confinement in the county jail.

There are neither bills of exception nor statement of facts in the record. We have examined the charge of the court and the indictment herein, and find both to be in conformity with the law. The motion for new trial is a purely formal one, and presents nothing except that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nicholson v. State, 226 S.W. 405, 88 Tex. Crim. 311, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 447 (Tex. 1920).

226 S.W. 405 (Nicholson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.