Nicholson v. State
250 So. 2d 347, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6292
Opinion
The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. See Meinsen v. State, Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 188; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 612; Thomas [348] v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 361; Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863; Byrd v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 1; Powell v. .State, Fla.App.1971, 244 So.2d 746; and Coleman v. State, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 699.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nicholson v. State, 250 So. 2d 347, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6292 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
250 So. 2d 347 (Nicholson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fisher v. State
239 So. 2d 863 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Brown v. State
191 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Thomas v. State
190 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Coleman v. State
193 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Meinsen v. State
240 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Byrd v. State
243 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Powell v. State
244 So. 2d 746 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)