Nicholson v. Showerman
6 Wend. 554
This text of 6 Wend. 554 (Nicholson v. Showerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nicholson v. Showerman, 6 Wend. 554 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).
Opinion
By the Court,
The motion must be denied. It is not shewn that the demand of the plaintiff was unreasonably resisted or neglected. The action was defended [555]*555apon the merits, and although the defence failed, it does not necessarily follow that it was improper to have made it; for aught that appears, the evidence in the case may have been nicely balanced.
Motion denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vaughn v. Strong
21 N.Y.S. 154 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Mersereau v. Ryerss
12 How. Pr. 300 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Fort v. Gooding
9 Barb. 388 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Gansevoort v. Nelson
6 Hill & Den. 389 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Phillips v. Governor
2 Ark. 382 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1840)
Harvey v. Skillman's
22 Wend. 571 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)
Carhart v. Blaisdell's Executors
18 Wend. 280 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Wend. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-v-showerman-nysupct-1831.