Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit

Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit

866 P.2d 525, 126 Or. App. 172, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 86
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 26, 1994
Docket91-03460; CA A76237
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 866 P.2d 525 (Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit, 866 P.2d 525, 126 Or. App. 172, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 86 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it does not have jurisdiction to review an order of the Director under ORS 656.245(1)(b) concerning the appropriateness of palliative care. We have disposed of most of the issues that claimant raises in Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549, 865 P2d 503 (1993). Claimant contends that the Board’s ruling that claimant has no right to a hearing on palliative care disputes violates the United States and Oregon constitutions. The issue is raised for the first time on review, and we will not address it.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit & Saif Corp.
884 P.2d 864 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
Samayoa v. Greenwood Inn
867 P.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 P.2d 525, 126 Or. App. 172, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-v-salem-area-transit-orctapp-1994.