Nicholson v. Ross Products, Inc.
506 So. 2d 487, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1172, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8043
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1987·No. No. 4-86-0891·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Although we sympathize with appellant’s position that reason and consistency would suggest that attorney’s fees be awarded upon a judicial determination that an employee has been wrongfully discharged because he filed a worker’s compensation claim, we can find no provision in the statutes for such an award. See § 440.205, Fla.Stat. (1985). We disagree with appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to find and enforce a stipulation between the parties for the award of fees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nicholson v. Ross Products, Inc., 506 So. 2d 487, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1172, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8043 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 487 (Nicholson v. Ross Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flores v. ROOF TILE ADMIN., INC.
887 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)