Nicholson v. Nicholson Goal Co.

190 Ill. App. 607
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 9, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 190 Ill. App. 607 (Nicholson v. Nicholson Goal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicholson v. Nicholson Goal Co., 190 Ill. App. 607 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Mortgages, § 226*—when grantee not presumed to have assumed payment of debt. It will not be presumed that the grantee of real estate subject to a mortgage indebtedness has undertaken to pay off such indebtedness and relieve the grantor of his obligation to make such payment, unless it is plainly provided in the instrument of conveyance accepted by the grantee that he shall pay such indebtedness, or it is otherwise so provided by contract to which he is a party. 2. Mortgages, § 226*—when parol evidenc admissible to construe agreement as to assumption of debt. Pai Menee held admissible to explain the language of a mern'o, agreement with reference to whether the party signing tht "reed to pay incumbrances on real estate in case he purchai ' 3. Mortgages, § 33*—parol evidence. Parol evic. .iSsible to show that a deed which is absolute in form , intended to he an equitable mortgage. 4. Mortgages, § 222*—when memorandum agreement oes not assume payment of mortgage indebtedness. A memorandum agreement entered into by a person considering the purchase of real estate, held not to show, when considered with or without the deed, any intention on his part to assume payment of a mortgage indebtedness against the property in case he should take the property. 5. Contracts, § 206a*—when third Party entitled to enforce contract. Before a third party can acquire a right which he can enforce in a contract between others, he must be a party to the consideration or the contract must have been entered into for his benefit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iser Electric Co. v. Ingran Construction Co.
362 N.E.2d 771 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1977)
Erzinger v. Gerrity
271 Ill. App. 450 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1933)
Allen v. Hoopes
249 N.W. 570 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1933)
People ex rel. National Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. Merkle
269 Ill. App. 449 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 Ill. App. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-v-nicholson-goal-co-illappct-1914.