Nicholson v. . Nichols

20 S.E. 294, 115 N.C. 200
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee. Cueiam :

It is well settled that there can be no lien in cases of this character, unless the work was done or materials furnished under a contract either express or implied. Weir v. Page, 109 N. C., 220; Thompson v. Taylor, 110 N. C., 70. There is no evidence of any such contract in this case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nicholson v. . Nichols, 20 S.E. 294, 115 N.C. 200 (N.C. 1894).

20 S.E. 294 (Nicholson v. . Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Potter v. Davidson
21 P.2d 785 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Honeycutt v. . Kenilworth Development Co.
154 S.E. 628 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Porter v. . Case
122 S.E. 483 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Weathers v. . Cox
76 S.E. 7 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)