Nicholson v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.
This text of 51 F. App'x 750 (Nicholson v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Arvilla M. Nicholson appeals pro se the jury verdict in favor of her former employer in her employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss the appeal.
We are unable to review Nicholson’s contentions that defense counsel introduced irrelevant and prejudicial evidence during trial, and made prejudicial remarks during closing argument because Nicholson has failed to provide a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); see also Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (holding that the court may dismiss appeal or refuse to consider appellant’s contentions when appellant fails to supply a trial transcript).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 F. App'x 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-v-con-way-transportation-services-inc-ca9-2002.