Nicholson v. Balkcom
This text of 121 S.E.2d 648 (Nicholson v. Balkcom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only showing of service of the bill of exceptions is a certificate by plaintiff in error that he had served the defendant by mailing same. This clearly falls short of the requirement found in the statute (Code Ann. § 6-911; Ga. L. 1953, Nov-Dec. Sess., pp. 440, 456). The record thus showing a lack of service, the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Walden v. Weston, 183 Ga. 276 (188 SE 335); Warnock v. Woodard, 183 Ga. 367 (188 SE 336).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 S.E.2d 648, 217 Ga. 206, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-v-balkcom-ga-1961.