Nicholson Live-Stock Co. v. Crumley-Sharp Hardware Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Nicholson Live-Stock Co. v. Crumley-Sharp Hardware Co.

133 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 426, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 417

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1926

Docket17036

StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 272 (Nicholson Live-Stock Co. v. Crumley-Sharp Hardware Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicholson Live-Stock Co. v. Crumley-Sharp Hardware Co., 133 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 426, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 417 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

While the evidence as to the purchase by the defendant company of the goods in question was in conflict, the direct testimony for the plaintiff, together with the proved surrounding facts and circumstances, was sufficient to authorize a verdict in its favor, and this court can not set the verdict aside on the general grounds, which are the only exceptions taken.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

While the evidence as to the purchase by the defendant company of the goods in question was in conflict, the direct testimony for the plaintiff, together with the proved surrounding facts and circumstances, was sufficient to authorize a verdict in its favor, and this court can not set the verdict aside on the general grounds, which are the only exceptions taken.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 426, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-live-stock-co-v-crumley-sharp-hardware-co-gactapp-1926.