NICHOLSON, DEREK, PEOPLE v

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 2015·No. KA 14-00784·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

660 KA 14-00784 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEREK NICHOLSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

HUNT & BAKER, HAMMONDSPORT (BRENDA S. ASTON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered December 26, 2013. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject defendant’s contention that reversal is required because County Court failed to state what burden of proof it imposed on defendant’s request for a downward departure (see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861). In any event, we conclude, based upon our review of the record, that defendant failed to establish his entitlement to a downward departure by a preponderance of the evidence (see People v Merkley, 125 AD3d 1479, 1479; see generally Gillotti, 23 NY3d at 861).

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NICHOLSON, DEREK, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

NICHOLSON, DEREK, PEOPLE v (NICHOLSON, DEREK, PEOPLE v) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Merkley
125 A.D.3d 1479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)