Nicholson & Co. v. Pelanne Bros.

14 La. Ann. 508
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 15, 1859·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mebrick, C. J.

The plaintiff is concluded by the first bill which he presented the defendants for the work done under the contract. Without showing error he cannot be permitted to recover the disputed items added to this bill since it was rendered.

There is no foundation for the reconventional demand.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the lower court be amended so as to reduce the principal sum decreed the plaintiff from $3400 to $3350, and that the judgment so amended be affirmed, the plaintiff paying the costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nicholson & Co. v. Pelanne Bros., 14 La. Ann. 508 (La. 1859).

14 La. Ann. 508 (Nicholson & Co. v. Pelanne Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caneer v. Kent
119 S.W.2d 214 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
McCormick v. Interstate Consolidated Rapid Transit Railway Co.
55 S.W. 252 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)