Nicholson & Co. v. Pelanne Bros.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Nicholson & Co. v. Pelanne Bros.

14 La. Ann. 508

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 15, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 La. Ann. 508 (Nicholson & Co. v. Pelanne Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicholson & Co. v. Pelanne Bros., 14 La. Ann. 508 (La. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Mebrick, C. J.

The plaintiff is concluded by the first bill which he presented the defendants for the work done under the contract. Without showing error he cannot be permitted to recover the disputed items added to this bill since it was rendered.

There is no foundation for the reconventional demand.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the lower court be amended so as to reduce the principal sum decreed the plaintiff from $3400 to $3350, and that the judgment so amended be affirmed, the plaintiff paying the costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mebrick, C. J.

The plaintiff is concluded by the first bill which he presented the defendants for the work done under the contract. Without showing error he cannot be permitted to recover the disputed items added to this bill since it was rendered.

There is no foundation for the reconventional demand.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the lower court be amended so as to reduce the principal sum decreed the plaintiff from $3400 to $3350, and that the judgment so amended be affirmed, the plaintiff paying the costs of appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 La. Ann. 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholson-co-v-pelanne-bros-la-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack