Nichols v. Whiting

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Nichols v. Whiting

1 Root 443

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedAugust 15, 1792

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1 Root 443 (Nichols v. Whiting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. Whiting, 1 Root 443 (Colo. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

There is nothing! erroneous in the judgment complained of; the plea in bar is insufficient, in that it doth not particularize the articles of shopwork tendered', whereby they could be distinguished and known. Otherwise the plaintiff would be barred of his action, by the tender, without being able ever to recover the articles tendered, for want of being particularly distinguished and described.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

There is nothing! erroneous in the judgment complained of; the plea in bar is insufficient, in that it doth not particularize the articles of shopwork tendered', whereby they could be distinguished and known. Otherwise the plaintiff would be barred of his action, by the tender, without being able ever to recover the articles tendered, for want of being particularly distinguished and described.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-whiting-conn-1792.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack