Nichols v. Weil
This text of 30 Misc. 441 (Nichols v. Weil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon evidence ample therefor, the learned justice below determined that the plaintiff had rendered work, labor and services and furnished material upon certain premises, under an agreement with the defendant, who testified that he had informed the plaintiff that he was not the owner, but the attorney for the owner of the premises. Inasmuch as the 'defendant did not disclose the name of his principal, his contention against personal liability was ineffectual. Argersinger v. Macnaughton, 114 N. Y. 535; Nelson v. Andrews, 19 Misc. Rep. 623.
Freedman, P. J., and Leventritt, J.; concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Misc. 441, 62 N.Y.S. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-weil-nyappterm-1900.