Nichols v. W & L STEEL ERECTORS

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nichols v. W & L STEEL ERECTORS

163 S.W.3d 483, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 2005 WL 1018175

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2005·No. ED 84731·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer and insurer appeal from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Claimant’s motions to strike employer’s and insurer’s brief, to dismiss the appeal, and for sanctions are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer and insurer appeal from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Claimant’s motions to strike employer’s and insurer’s brief, to dismiss the appeal, and for sanctions are denied as moot.

Nichols v. W & L STEEL ERECTORS, 163 S.W.3d 483, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 695, 2005 WL 1018175 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

163 S.W.3d 483 (Nichols v. W & L STEEL ERECTORS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.