Nichols v. Vitek

321 A.2d 570, 114 N.H. 453, 1974 N.H. LEXIS 299
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 28, 1974·No. 6896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

This petitioner for habeas corpus seeks his liberty on the ground that his conviction for manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser included offense of murder for which he was indicted violated his constitutional and statutory (RSA 601:1) right not to be tried and convicted of the offense of manslaughter without being specifically indicted therefor.

There is no question but that manslaughter is a lesser included offense of murder. The indictment for murder contains all the allegations essential to constitute a charge of manslaughter. State v. Butman, 42 N.H. 490 (1861); State v. Zelichowski, 52 N.J. 377, 245 A.2d 351 (1968).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Vitek, 321 A.2d 570, 114 N.H. 453, 1974 N.H. LEXIS 299 (N.H. 1974).

321 A.2d 570 (Nichols v. Vitek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McPhail
362 A.2d 199 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1976)
State v. Conklin
341 A.2d 770 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1975)
State v. Booton
329 A.2d 376 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1974)
Doe v. State
328 A.2d 784 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1974)