Nichols v. Village Park Mobile Home Estates, Inc.
Opinion
Plaintiffs sued the defendant to obtain a real estate commission. Suffering entry of summary judgment, plaintiffs appeal. We have reviewed the record in the light of the points on appeal and reverse. We do so because we find disputed issues of critical fact as to the existence of a contract be[808] tween the parties and as to the plaintiff’s performance of the contract. Such circumstance bars use of summary judgment procedure. Lewis v. Tyner, Fla.App.1961, 125 So.2d 328; Chapman v. Tison, Fla.App.1962, 137 So.2d 605; Enes v. Baker, Fla.1952, 58 So.2d 551; Hartnett v. Fowler, Fla.1957, 94 So.2d 724. See also generally Weisberg v. Perl, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 56; Carter v. Livesay Window Co., Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 411; Weber v. Porco, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 146; Harvey Bldg., Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So.2d 780; Humphrys v. Jarrell, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 404.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
237 So. 2d 807 (Nichols v. Village Park Mobile Home Estates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.