Nichols v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Nichols v. State

32 S.W.2d 1115

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nichols v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 219 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 1930·No. No. 13785·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any bills of exception. There were no objections to the court’s charge, and no special charges requested. We have examined the statement of facts, and believe the testimony sufficiently shows the guilt of the accused.

The judgment will be affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any bills of exception. There were no objections to the court’s charge, and no special charges requested. We have examined the statement of facts, and believe the testimony sufficiently shows the guilt of the accused.

The judgment will be affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., absent.

Nichols v. State, 32 S.W.2d 1115 (Tex. 1930).

Pincite

32 S.W.2d 1115 (Nichols v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.