Nichols v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Nichols v. State

1916 OK CR 87, 159 P. 1091, 12 Okla. Crim. 533, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 30, 1916

DocketNo. A-2625.

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK CR 87 (Nichols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. State, 1916 OK CR 87, 159 P. 1091, 12 Okla. Crim. 533, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94 (Okla. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Leo Nichols, was convicted in the county court of Pottawatomie county on a charge that he did have possession of intoxicating liquors, to-wit., whisky with intent to sell the same and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for sixty days and a fine of Two Hundred and Eifty Dollars.

From the judgment and sentence entered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court on January 6, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

The evidence shows that Gus Mitchell, deputy sheriff and two or three other deputies in serving a search warrant against the Old Herald Building in ithe city of Shawnee, found the defendant there in possession of certain intoxicating liquors,, which he attempted to destroy in the presence of the officers. No* evidence was offered on behalf of the defendant.

From a careful examination of the record, it appears that this appeal is -wholly destitute of merit. The evidence of guilt is conclusive, and no material error is apparent. The judgment and sentence appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Leo Nichols, was convicted in the county court of Pottawatomie county on a charge that he did have possession of intoxicating liquors, to-wit., whisky with intent to sell the same and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for sixty days and a fine of Two Hundred and Eifty Dollars.

From the judgment and sentence entered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court on January 6, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

The evidence shows that Gus Mitchell, deputy sheriff and two or three other deputies in serving a search warrant against the Old Herald Building in ithe city of Shawnee, found the defendant there in possession of certain intoxicating liquors,, which he attempted to destroy in the presence of the officers. No* evidence was offered on behalf of the defendant.

From a careful examination of the record, it appears that this appeal is -wholly destitute of merit. The evidence of guilt is conclusive, and no material error is apparent. The judgment and sentence appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK CR 87, 159 P. 1091, 12 Okla. Crim. 533, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-state-oklacrimapp-1916.