Nichols v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nichols v. State

571 S.W.3d 242

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 2019·No. ED 106745·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Nichols appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Nichols appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Nichols v. State, 571 S.W.3d 242 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

571 S.W.3d 242 (Nichols v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.