Nichols v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nichols v. State

571 S.W.3d 242

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 9, 2019

DocketED 106745

StatusPublished

This text of 571 S.W.3d 242 (Nichols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. State, 571 S.W.3d 242 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Nichols appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Nichols appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 S.W.3d 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-state-moctapp-2019.