Nichols v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nichols v. State

276 S.W.3d 859, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 62, 2009 WL 580219

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 2009

DocketWD 68845

StatusPublished

This text of 276 S.W.3d 859 (Nichols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. State, 276 S.W.3d 859, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 62, 2009 WL 580219 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*860 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jesse L. Nichols appeals from the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*860 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jesse L. Nichols appeals from the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 S.W.3d 859, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 62, 2009 WL 580219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack