Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nichols v. State

Nichols v. State

554 So. 2d 669, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 62, 1990 WL 770
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nichols v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 504 So. 2d 414 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1990·No. No. 89-00181·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s judgments and sentences for two separate acts, sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine. The trial court correctly enhanced the sentence under the habitual offender statute and made the necessary findings on the record. § 775.084, Fla.Stat. (1987). On remand, however, each sentence shall be clerically corrected to reflect that the defendant was sentenced under the special provisions for habitual offenders.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. State, 554 So. 2d 669, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 62, 1990 WL 770 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

554 So. 2d 669 (Nichols v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.