Nichols v. State Ex Rel. Archer

190 So. 11, 138 Fla. 648
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 20, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Terrell, C. J. —

West D. Archer, the defendant in error, was discharged as an employee of the City of Miami. He brought mandamus to enforce his reinstatement relying on his status under the Civil Service Code of Rules and Regulations. A motion to quash the alternative writ was' denied and the City 'announcing that it would rely on' the motion to quash, peremptory writ was issued to which judgment, the instant writ of error was prosecuted.

It is contended that the alternative writ is defective in that it fails to allege any legal duty on the part of the City or that there are funds in the city treasury available to pay relator.

The alternative writ has been' examined as have brief's of counsel, .'and the judgment below found to be free from error. It is affirmed on authority of State ex rel Whitehead v. Ulsch, et al., 137 Fla. 321, 188 So. 216.

Affirmed.

*649 Whitfield, Brown; Buford, Chapman, and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. State Ex Rel. Archer, 190 So. 11, 138 Fla. 648 (Fla. 1939).

190 So. 11 (Nichols v. State Ex Rel. Archer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Hawkins v. McCall
29 So. 2d 739 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
Nelson v. Lindsey
10 So. 2d 131 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)