Nichols v. State

796 S.W.2d 346, 303 Ark. 328, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 446
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 8, 1990
DocketRC 90-36
StatusPublished

This text of 796 S.W.2d 346 (Nichols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. State, 796 S.W.2d 346, 303 Ark. 328, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 446 (Ark. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Terry Wade Nichols, by his attorney, J. F. Atkinson, Jr., has filed a motion for reconsideration of his motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
796 S.W.2d 346, 303 Ark. 328, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-state-ark-1990.