Nichols v. State

89 So. 847, 18 Ala. App. 184, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 155
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1921·No. 4 Div. 713.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

[1] The ruling of the court upon the demurrers to the indictment was so obviously free fqom error that this question needs no discussion. Code 1907, § 7151, and eases cited in footnotes.

[2] The court’s ruling upon the evidence is free from error.

The evidence adduced upon the trial of this cause was in conflict, and there was ample evidence, if believed by the .jury, upon which to predicate a verdict of guilt.

■The affirmative charge was properly refused.

No error appearing, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. State, 89 So. 847, 18 Ala. App. 184, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 155 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

89 So. 847 (Nichols v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Myrick v. State
100 So. 455 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Casey v. State
97 So. 165 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)