Nichols v. State
This text of 89 So. 847 (Nichols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence adduced upon the trial of this cause was in conflict, and there was ample evidence, if believed by the .jury, upon which to predicate a verdict of guilt.
■The affirmative charge was properly refused.
No error appearing, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 So. 847, 18 Ala. App. 184, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-state-alactapp-1921.