Nichols v. State

89 So. 847, 18 Ala. App. 184, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 155
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 1921
Docket4 Div. 713.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 So. 847 (Nichols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. State, 89 So. 847, 18 Ala. App. 184, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 155 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

[1] The ruling of the court upon the demurrers to the indictment was so obviously free fqom error that this question needs no discussion. Code 1907, § 7151, and eases cited in footnotes.

[2] The court’s ruling upon the evidence is free from error.

The evidence adduced upon the trial of this cause was in conflict, and there was ample evidence, if believed by the .jury, upon which to predicate a verdict of guilt.

■The affirmative charge was properly refused.

No error appearing, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myrick v. State
100 So. 455 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Casey v. State
97 So. 165 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 So. 847, 18 Ala. App. 184, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-state-alactapp-1921.