Nichols v. Stahl

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Nichols v. Stahl

1938 OK 137, 76 P.2d 1043, 182 Okla. 191, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 101

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 1, 1938

DocketNo. 27326.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1938 OK 137 (Nichols v. Stahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. Stahl, 1938 OK 137, 76 P.2d 1043, 182 Okla. 191, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 101 (Okla. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

This is a companion case to Allen & Scott, Inc., v. Stahl et al., 181 Okla. 527, 75 P.2d 204. In the present case the immediate grantor of defendant in error Stahl was plaintiff in error Nichols, while in' the cited case his grantor was Allen & Scott, Inc. Otherwise, the facts and transactions in connection with the mortgage, the contract and the deed in that case are substantially the same as in this case, except that different property was involved. Similarly, the issues of fact and law, the judgments of the trial court, and the contentions on appeal are identical. The rules of law and syllabus in that case are adopted here, and on the authority of that decision the judgment is affirmed.

OSBORN, O. J., and CORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON. J.T., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHELPS, J.

This is a companion case to Allen & Scott, Inc., v. Stahl et al., 181 Okla. 527, 75 P.2d 204. In the present case the immediate grantor of defendant in error Stahl was plaintiff in error Nichols, while in' the cited case his grantor was Allen & Scott, Inc. Otherwise, the facts and transactions in connection with the mortgage, the contract and the deed in that case are substantially the same as in this case, except that different property was involved. Similarly, the issues of fact and law, the judgments of the trial court, and the contentions on appeal are identical. The rules of law and syllabus in that case are adopted here, and on the authority of that decision the judgment is affirmed.

OSBORN, O. J., and CORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON. J.T., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1938 OK 137, 76 P.2d 1043, 182 Okla. 191, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-stahl-okla-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack